Friday, December 13, 2013

BEELZEBUB McCARTHY POISONED THE WELL !!!

Kevin BEELZEBUB McCarthy, the self- proclaimed "Pope of the Church-in-America," was forced to drink the water from the well that he deliberately poisoned.  Good for Beelzebub! 

BEELZEBUB McCarthy and Sir Albert Langsenkramp, who BEELZEBUB has characterized as "mentally unstable" (a perfect example of the pot calling the kettle "black") insisted on deposing Bishop Richard Garcia at Monterey, California.

Sr. Joseph Therese, CIT, opposed the last-minute deposition because of the expense related to travel and lodging, which, of course, is the primary motivation of BEELZEBUB McCARTHY  and the "mentally unstable" (according to BEELZEBUB McCARTHY) Sir Albert Langsenkramp.  IN FACT, BEELZEBUB AND SIR ALBERT HAVE FILED A MOTION IN LIMINE, A PRE-TRIAL MOTION, SEEKING TO PREVENT SR. JOSEPH THERESE AND THE BLOGGER FROM BRINGING UP THE EXCESSIVE COSTS TO DEFEND THIS LAWSUIT, ALL DUE AND OWING TO THE NUMEROUS FRIVOLOUS MOTIONS THEY HAVE FILED FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF DRIVING UP THE COSTS OF THIS LITIGATION.


In order to analyze the bogus claims that Sir Albert Langsenkramp and Beelzebub McCarthy offered to support the "critical need" to depose Bishop Richard Garcia at this late date, as the trial date rapidly approaches, the blogger turns to a publicly filed document, Document No. 671, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. This particular document is captioned Sir Albert's and Beelzebub's RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIMANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.

The blogger will now publish excerpts from Sir Albert's and Beelzebub's OPPOSITION along  with the blogger's commentary:

"In particular, Bishop Garcia can testify about: (1) his request that McCarthy get involved in the Our Lady of America devotion (the "Devotion"); (2) his reasons for asking McCarthy to get involved in the Devotion; and (3) his communications with the parties to this lawsuit, including the defamatory letters that he received from Fuller and her associates after the relationship between the parties soured."

"Bishop Garcia’s testimony is critical to Plaintiffs’ case. His testimony will explain why Plaintiffs became involved in promoting the Devotion. More importantly, his testimony will contradict Fuller’s argument that Plaintiffs [Sir Albert and Beelzebub McCarthy], driven by greed and avarice, targeted Fuller and then swooped down and stole the Devotion from her."
"In this instance, Bishop Garcia’s testimony will be highly relevant to the underlying story of the relationship between Plaintiffs and Fuller that is at the heart of all of the claims. Because Plaintiffs and Fuller tell very different stories regarding the history of their involvement, the testimony of Bishop Garcia (a highly respected member of the clergy) will be invaluable to the jury as it considers the parties’ testimony regarding the events that gave rise to this dispute."  
"Accordingly, Bishop Garcia’s testimony is highly relevant, as it will confirm McCarthy’s story of why he agreed to become involved in the Devotion. Specifically, McCarthy was not driven by greed or a desire to hijack the devotion, as Defendants contend."
"In addition, Bishop Garcia’s testimony will also contradict Fuller’s claim that Plaintiffs "descended upon her at their own initiative," as well as Fuller’s claim that "she did not invite them to participate in her work with the Our Lady of America Center." (Dkt. 230-1, pg. 24.) Also, Bishop Garcia’s testimony will confirm Plaintiffs’ [Sir Albert and Beelzebub McCarthy] position that Fuller actively worked to get McCarthy involved in the Devotion."
"In addition to testifying regarding the facts that led Plaintiffs to become involved with Fuller, Bishop Garcia can also testify regarding the breakdown of the relationship between Plaintiffs and Fuller, as well as the defamation that followed."
"Specifically, Bishop Garcia was the person to whom Audrey Frank, [ another witness] and Fuller initially sent the taped conversations between [the witness] and others [Sir Albert and BEELZEBUB McCarthy] that led, in part, to this suit.
"In addition, Bishop Garcia was a recipient of many defamatory communications that were sent by Fuller and her associates. As a result, Bishop Garcia can testify regarding these communications and the effect that was caused by these communications." 

Plaintiffs note the following instances (these are direct quotes) where Defendants have alleged that Bishop Ricken was bribed or otherwise guilty of wrongdoing:
 
  • Dkt. 113, pg. 24: "In fact, in his ‘affidavit,’ Easton does not claim that he ever spoke with Ricken about Ricken’s motivation for sending the letter on behalf of McCarthy, et al., which motivation was money. [See, e.g., Exhibit 44, showing a minimum of $45,000.00 from BVM to Ricken in two years]."
  • Dkt. 113, pg. 26: "The only inference to be drawn from this evidence is that McCarthy stole the Archival Statue from Sister M. J. Therese and that Ricken falsely and unlawfully supported McCarthy’s fraudulent claim of ownership, motivated by financial reward."
  •      Dkt. 230-1, pg. 57: "At that time, Sister Mary Joseph Therese was not aware of the considerable financial favors that Kevin McCarthy, Albert Langsenkamp, and BVM Foundation were lavishing upon Ricken and the close ties between them."
  •     Dkt. 230-1, pg. 59: "Even the limited discovery materials turned over to Counterclaimants, to date, simply tell the tale, as seen by some of the evidentiary Exhibits in the Appendix to this brief, Ricken and Burke have accepted so much money from Langsenkamp, McCarthy, and BVM, and have been willing to sign whatever letters McCarthy lays in front of them, regardless of their falsity and regardless of how many lives they destroy."

  •     Dkt. 526, pg. 15: "Examples of Counterclaims Defendants’ corruption of the Catholic Clergy are numerous. Langsenkamp, McCarthy and the BVM Foundation have ‘contributed’ no less than the sum of $65,000.00 to Bishop David Ricken, in exchange for which, in part, Ricken signed and issued a Letter of Admonishment to Sister Mary Joseph Therese, CIT, and two other women, supporters of Sister Mary Joseph Therese, CIT, when he had absolutely no jurisdiction over any of them. In his deposition testimony, Bishop Ricken admitted that Kevin McCarthy ‘typed’ the Letter of Admonishment at Cheyenne, Wyoming. The number of ‘favors’ Ricken has performed for Counterclaims Defendants in exchange for the consideration he has received from them is too extensive to enumerate in this brief."
  •     Dkt. 526, pg. 60: "Inspector Hartman fully intends to expose all of the evidence implicating the hierarchy of the Catholic Church in the unlawful schemes of Langsenkamp and McCarthy, including Bishop David Ricken and Cardinal Raymond Burke. The conduct of these so-called successors of the Apostles and princes of the Church is nothing short of shameful and disgraceful conduct that, unfortunately, threatens to bring even more disrepute to the Catholic Church."
  
  •     Vol. II of Hartman’s Deposition: "Q. Do you contend that Bishop Ricken's signature is forged on Exhibit Number 95? A. Oh, no. No. That's part of the bribery. They gave him [Ricken] money, he signed the letter and mailed it, which again goes to the corruption of the clergy, the hierarchy in the church; they'll do for money things that are immoral and illegal." (A copy of this portion of the deposition transcript is filed herewith as  Exhibit C.)

  •      February 23, 2009 blog entry titled "Ad Majorem Pecuniae Gloria!": "Sadly, BISHOP RICKEN and ARCHBISHOP BURKE, clergy of Holy Mother Church, appear to have willingly entered into such an unholy exchange and alliance with LANGSENKAMP & MCCARTHY! These clergymen have accepted sums of money from these MINIONS of the fallen angel, in exchange for which they appear to have complied with the MINIONS’ requests to provide great services, all to the benefit of these MINIONS, and contrary to the best interests of Our Blessed Mother, Our Lady of America." (A copy of this blog posting is filed herewith as Exhibit D.)
  •     November 16, 2012 blog entry titled "The Question of the Day!": "Question of the Day: WHAT IS THE COST TO PURCHASE A BISHOP OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, LIKE GREEN BAY BISHOP DAVID RICKEN; AND JUST HOW MUCH DOES IT COST TO PURCHASE A CARDINAL OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, LIKE CARDINAL RAYMOND LEO BURKE? After no small amount of research and review, and no small amount of pondering, the blogger has arrived at a reasonable answer. Answer: ONLY LANGSENKRAMP, McCARTHY, THEIR ATTORNEYS MIKE ‘BIG’ LEBOWSKI, MICHAEL NOT-SO SWIFT, RICKEN, AND BURKE KNOW THE ANSWER, AND NONE OF THEM IS TALKING. IN FACT, BIG LEBOWSKI AND NOT-SOSWIFT HAVE DONE ALL WITHIN THEIR POWER TO CONCEAL THAT INFORMATION." (A copy of this blog posting is filed herewith as Exhibit E.)
  •     In addition, no other witness can testify regarding Bishop Garcia’s impression of the defamatory letters he received.
  •     Finally, Bishop Garcia can certainly testify regarding his receipt of defamatory letters from Fuller and her associates, as well as his impression of those letters, without alluding to hearsay
  • Generally speaking, Bishop Garcia has knowledge of the facts that led Plaintiffs to get involved with Fuller, as well as knowledge regarding the defamation that occurred after the parties had their fallout. Because Plaintiffs and Defendants have conflicting stories on these issues, the testimony of a respected member of the clergy is highly relevant to the stories that each side will be presenting to the jury.
 The reader has been presented with the unfounded claims of Sir Albert Langsenkramp and Kevin BEELZEBUB McCarthy, both pseudo-Catholics and disciples of the Father of All Lies. 

Just about everything that Sir Albert Langsenkramp and BEELZEBUB McCARTHY have claimed in their Opposition is simply pure garbage, and is just what the blogger would expect coming from Sir Albert and BEELZEBUB.

THE ONLY FACTUALLY ACCURATE INFORMATION IN ALL OF THEIR CLAIMS IS THAT BISHOP RICHARD GARCIA IS A HIGHLY RESPECTED MEMBER OF THE CATHOLIC CLERGY.

EVERYTHING ELSE THAT SIR ALBERT AND BEELZEBUB HAVE CLAIMED IS FALSE AND UNSUPPORTED BY ANY EVIDENCE, AND ORIGINATE FROM THE MIND AND MOUTH OF BEELZEBUB McCARTHY, CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTERIZATION OF HIM AS A SPINELESS CON MAN.

A CON MAN LIKE BEELZEBUB McCARTHY WILL STEAL ANYTHING FROM ANYONE IN THE BLINK OF AN EYE, WITHOUT ANY COMPUNCTION WHATSOEVER.

AN ANALYSIS OF THE FALSE AND FRAUDULENT CLAIMS OF SIR ALBERT AND BEELEZEBUB McCARTHY WILL FOLLOW IN THE NEXT POST AT THIS BLOG.






 
 






 
 
 
 
 



 
 




 








 

Sunday, November 17, 2013

THAT GREAT SUCKING SOUND IN INDIANA !!!

The blogger, a resident of the State of Ohio, lives in a reasonably rural area.  On otherwise quiet, starlit nights, the silence is frequently shattered by a great sucking sound, originating from the west.

After much investigation and consideration, the blogger has concluded that the great sucking sound originates in the State of Indiana.

Moreover, the blogger has determined that the cause of the great sucking sound coming from Indiana is KEVIN BEELZEBUB McCARTHY SUCKING THE MONEY OUT OF SIR ALBERT LANGSENKRAMP.

THIS IS NOTHING NEW FOR KEVIN BEELZEBUB McCARTHY, WHO SUCKED MORE THAN $1.6 MILLION OUT OF THE BVM (BOUNTIFUL VOLUMES OF MONEY) FOUNDATION, INC. IN A FOUR YEAR PERIOD.

THE BVM FOUNDATION IS REGISTERED WITH THE IRS AS A "NOT-FOR-PROFIT" NON-TAXABLE ORGANIZATION, ESTABLISHED FOR THE PROFIT OF KEVIN BEELZEBUB McCARTHY.

AFTER McCARTHY SUCKED THE COFFERS OF THE BVM FOUNDATION DRY, HE TURNED TO SUCKING THE MONEY OUT OF LANGSENKRAMP.

KEVIN BEELZEBUB McCARTHY HAS, AND CONTINUES, TO PLAY LANGSENKRAMP LIKE A FINE VIOLIN.

THE PROOF IS ALWAYS IN THE PUDDING.  KEVIN BEELZEBUB HAS NOT CONTRIBUTED ONE THIN DIME TO THE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN ATTORNEYS' FEES THAT LANGSENKRAMP HAS SHELLED OUT TO PURSUE THE PHONY LITIGATION AGAINST SISTER JOSEPH THERESE.

ALTHOUGH, TO BE HONEST, LANGSENKRAMP HAS BENEFITTED TO A DEGREE IN THAT HE LAUNDERED HIS ATTORNEYS' FEES THROUGH THE BVM FOUNDATION, THEN CLAIMING THOSE PAYMENTS ON HIS FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURNS, CLAIMING THE ATTORNEYS' FEES AS "CHARITABLE" DEDUCTIONS.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

SIR ALBERT LANGSENKRAMP & POPE KEVIN "BLACK BART" McCARTHY ADMIT FEDERAL INCOME TAX EVASION; NOW ATTEMPT TO EVADE CONSEQUENCES AT TRIAL !!!

WHAT A HOOT!  SIR ALBERT LANGSENKRAMP, KEVIN "BLACK BART" McCARTHY,  AND McCARTHY'S BVM FOUNDATION (BOUNTIFUL VOLUMES OF MONEY), INC. HAVE ADMITTED THAT THEY HAVE COMMITTED TAX FRAUD BY EVADING THEIR FEDERAL INCOME TAX OBLIGATIONS!  THEY NOW ATTEMPT TO EVADE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR TAX FRAUD AND THEIR FEDERAL INCOME TAX EVASION IN THE IMPENDING TRIAL IN U.S. DISTRICT OF INDIANA.

Firstly, the reader should know they filed the most recent lawsuit in Federal Court to harass, intimidate, and frighten the blogger.  That tactic, obviously did not work.  For one thing, Sir Albert Langsenkramp is just a computer geek and Kevin "Pope Black Bart" is nothing more than a loud-mouthed braggart with no backbone, in short a stereotypical con man.  The blogger has dealt with a hundred or more scammers like Black Bart.

When Sir Albert and Pope Black Bart filed their complaint in U.S. District Court, they alleged , IN BAD FAITH, the following:


39.)   On or about November 14, 2008, [the blogger] created or had created a website at


ourladyofamerica.blogspot.com (the "Blogspot Website"), where [the blogger] has posted numerous


false statements about McCarthy and Langsenkamp. Since the date that the Blogspot Website


was created, [the blogger] has uploaded new posting on an almost daily basis.

40.)   The Blogspot Website contains innumerable false statements made about

McCarthy and Langsenkamp. Some of the most egregious false statements include statements

that McCarthy and Langsenkamp: (a) unlawfully seized control of Fuller's website by means of a

fraudulent letter to which they forged the name and signature of Fuller; (b) seized control of the

Devotion by means of a series of deception, frauds, and thefts; (c) stole money and property from

Fuller; (d) committed tax fraud and other crimes; and (e) manipulated the bishops of the Catholic

Church with money. The claims made by Hartman are patently false and misleading.

The reader will note that LANGSENKRAMP AND BLACK BART have alleged, quite falsely as they well knew, that the blogger defamed them by revealing that they have committed tax fraud, which LANGSENKRAMP and BLACK BART McCARTHY have characterized as one of the most egregious false statements.

The blogger, obviously, can prove LANGSENKRAMP and McCarthy id, indeed, COMMIT TAX FRAUD BY EVADING THEIR FEDERAL INCOME TAX OBLIGATIONS.

OF COURSE, WHEN FACED WITH OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF  THE TAX FRAUD BY LANGSENKRAMP AND McCARTHY, THIEVES AND LIARS BOTH, THEIR ATTORNEY, MICHAEL "NOT SO" SWIFT, HAS INFORMED THE COURT THAT THEY WILL NOT PURSUE THAT FALSE CLAIM OF DEFAMATION SINCE SIR ALBERT AND POPE BLACK BART DON'T WANT THE JURY TO HEAR OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF THEIR TAX FRAUD AND INCOME TAX EVASION.  NOT-SO SWIFT, OF COURSE HAS ATTEMPTED TO CONCEAL EVIDENCE OF HIS CLIENTS' TAX FRAUD AND OTHER FINANCIAL CRIMES.

YOU, THE READER, CAN EVALUATE THE EVIDENCE AND DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT YOU CONCLUDE, AS HAS THE BLOGGER, THAT LANGSENKRAMP AND McCARTHY HAVE COMMITTED TAX FRAUD.

PRESENTED FOR THE READER'S REVIEW AND ANALYSIS ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE BLOGGER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION, A PUBLICLY FILED DOCUMENT THAT CAN BE FOUND AT THE PACER WEBSITE, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA CASE NO. 1-08-CV-994, DOCKET #649:


The Undisputed Evidence Proves That Plaintiffs, Albert H. Langsenkamp,
Kevin B. McCarthy, and the BVM Foundation, Inc., Have Each Committed Tax Fraud.

The Defendants can prove that Plaintiffs have brought their defamation claims

concerning their tax fraud in bad faith and that they have, indeed, committed tax fraud (and

money laundering) on many occasions over a period of years. The Plaintiffs filed the defamation

counts in their Amended Complaint not to redress any actual harm, but rather to harass, to

intimidate, and to harm [the blogger] and Sister Therese.

The Defendants are prepared to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, (not merely by a

preponderance of the evidence) that each one of the Plaintiffs has engaged in tax fraud. The

Defendants will do so by proving the following.


1. THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE GOVERNS TAX MATTERS
   PERTAINING TO THE BVM FOUNDATION, INC.

BVM Foundation, Inc. applied for, and was granted, tax-exempt status as a

§501(c)(3) not-for-profit corporation by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). 3

Chapter 3, §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code regulates BVM Foundation,

   as a tax-exempt, not-for-profit corporation.


2. PLAINTIFFS MADE UNLAWFUL DISTRIBUTIONS TO OFFICERS AND
   PRIVATE INTERESTS, IN VIOLATION OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.

Chapter 3, §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides, in pertinent
  part: No part of the organization's net earnings will inure to the benefit

  of private shareholders or individuals. You must establish that your
  organization will not be organized or operated for the benefit of private

  Interests, such as the creator or the creator's family, shareholders of the


  organization, other designated individuals, or persons controlled directly

  or indirectly by such private interests. [Emphasis added.]
 
The IRS requires the BVM Foundation, and other not-for-profit corporations, to

  file an annual federal tax return, IRS Form 990, available for public inspection.
Contrary to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, BVM Foundation produced

  copies of only parts of its check register in discovery, and to hinder review of the

   register, BVM’s attorneys’ scattered the register, piecemeal, throughout BVM’s

  production, rather than in any coherent or organized fashion, and certainly not in

  the fashion that it would maintain its register in the ordinary course of its
 
  business.
 
• [The blogger] prepared a spreadsheet of all transactions purportedly

  documented by the portions of the BVM Foundations check register that the BVM
  Foundation produced, except transactions that BVM redacted.
 
BVM Foundation redacted, without authority, no fewer than 32 transactions from

  its production of its check register, which redactions were calculated to conceal
  tax fraud.
 
Analysis of the BVM Foundation available check register disclosed that BVM

  Foundation disbursed at least $1.6 million, or no less than 47% of its total
  disbursements, to Plaintiff Kevin B. McCarthy, an officer, during the period 2004
 
  through 2008, in violation of the provisions of Chapter 3, §501(c)(3) cited above,

  thus disqualifying BVM Foundation as a not-for-profit corporation, and thereby
  depriving the United States Treasury of taxes, otherwise due it, from the BVM
 
  Foundation, a de facto for-profit corporation.

3. TAX RETURNS BY PLAINTIFFS, PERJURED DEPOSITION TESTIMONY,
    FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS, AND TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE TO
    CONCEAL THE TAX FRAUD.


BVM Foundation has posted numerous fraudulent entries on its federal tax

  returns, IRS Forms 990, calculated to deceive and to defraud the IRS of federal

  tax revenues. Other documents reveal the tax fraud.


Plaintiff Albert Langsenkamp admitted his illegal charitable deductions on cross-examination

   during his deposition testimony.

The Court ordered Plaintiff Albert Langsenkamp to produce his federal income

   tax returns in discovery; nevertheless, he has deliberately withheld portions of

  those returns in an attempt to conceal evidence of his tax fraud.

Documents show that Plaintiff Kevin B. McCarthy intended to apply for a

  fraudulent Tax Identification Number from the IRS to facilitate liquidation of the


  Key Bank stock certificates, property of Sister Therese.

Documents obtained in discovery prove that Plaintiff Kevin B. McCarthy

  attempted to evade payment of his federal income taxes for tax years 2007 and


  2008.

Documents prove that Plaintiff Kevin B. McCarthy offered deliberately false

  testimony at deposition in an attempt to conceal the tax fraud of the BVM


  Foundation.

Daniel Tekulve, President of the BVM Foundation, falsified documents, intended

  as evidence in this litigation, to conceal both the perjured testimony of Kevin


  McCarthy and the tax fraud by the BVM Foundation. Other documents prove his

  tampering with evidence, all at the direction of McCarthy and Langsenkamp.

  
  [The blogger] and Sister Mary Sister Therese, have evidentiary proof of all of the

  above.

AFTER REVIEWING THE FACTS, DO YOU, THE READER, FIND SIR ALBERT LANGSENKRAMP, POPE KEVIN "BLACK BART" McCARTHY, AND THE BVM FOUNDATION (BOUNTIFUL VOLUMES OF MONEY) INC. GUILTY OF INCOME TAX EVASION AND TAX FRAUD?

READERS CAN BE ASSURED THAT ATTORNEY MICHAEL "NOT SO" SWIFT WON'T BE PARADING THIS POST BEFORE THE JURY.



 
 





 

Friday, June 14, 2013

THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS OVERLOOKED A FEW MINOR DETAILS IN ISSUING ITS FLAWED RULING !!!

SIR ALBERT LANGSENKRAMP, A KNIGHT OF THE HOLEY (not to be confused with "holy") ROUND TABLE, and SELF-PROCLAIMED POPE OF THE CHURCH-IN-AMERICA KEVIN "BLACK BART" McCARTHY, A LAWYER IN TWO STATES (the State of Confusion and the State of Sin) are reveling in a recent misplaced opinion of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which has ruled that Sister Mary Joseph Therese, CIT, is not a nun of the Catholic Church..  LANGSENKRAMP and POPE BLACK BART McCARTHY have trumpeted this errant decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals in one of their recent non "newsletters."

In deciding this issue, the Court of Appeals issued the flawed ruling, failing to take into account that the "official decrees" of the Catholic Church were written and paid for by LANGSENKRAMP and POPE BLACK BART; and the documents upon which the court erroneously relied all originated with LANGSENKRAMP and McCARTHY, NOT FROM THE VATICAN.  LANGSENKRAMP and McCARTHY HAVE A HISTORY OF FABRICATING AND COUNTERFEITING DOCUMENTS AND ANY DOCUMENTS SENT BY THOSE TWO TO THE VATICAN FOR AUTHENTICATION ARE SERIOUSLY IN QUESTION !!!

The blogger will now present certain excerpts from the brief filed by Sister Mary Joseph Therese, CIT, A PERMANENTLY PROFESSED RELIGIOUS SISTER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, which she filed with the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals:

CONCERNING THE QUESTIONABLE DOCUMENTS:

The exhibits found in DN102-2, upon which Amicus relies, were claimed by McCarthy, et al to have been supplied by the Sisters of the Precious Blood (CPPS), and not the Holy See, the only authoritative source of official documents and records originating at the Vatican.
In fact, McCarthy submitted the documents, allegedly obtained from the Sisters of

the Precious Blood, to the Vatican accompanied by a request for authentication of those same

documents, a highly unorthodox procedure.
. . . . . .

          Competent, credible evidence suggests that there is no file on hand from which a comparison and authentication of the alleged CPPS documents that McCarthy, et al. submitted to the Holy See can be made.  On September 18, 2008, Sister Mary Joseph Therese, CIT, submitted a letter of request to Cardinal Franc Rode at the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life in the Holy See.  In her letter, Sister Mary Joseph Therese, CIT, requested a “complete copy of the file,” as well as “any and all documents which reflect any and all findings and decisions made upon Sister Neuzil’s request” to form an independent, autonomous Congregation of religious sisters, otherwise known as the Contemplative Sisters of the Indwelling Trinity.  See Deposition Exhibit 90.  To the present date, Sister Joseph Therese has received no reply, in spite of the fact that she followed up with a telephone inquiry of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life at the Holy See.  (Deposition Cite omitted.)
CONCERNING CHURCH INFLUENCE PURCHASED BY LANGSENKRAMP & McCARTHY:

            It is significant McCarthy, et al. made a gratuitous payment of $50,000.00 to then-Archbishop, now Cardinal James Harvey, an American born prelate and the Prefect of the Papal Household at the Vatican.  (Deposition Cite omitted.)
            McCarthy, et al. made a gratuitous payment of $5,000.00 to the Bishop of Alexandria, Louisiana, that the routed through the Office of the Papal Nunciature in Washington, D.C.(Deposition Cite omitted.)  The Apostolic Nunciature is the Holy See’s diplomatic mission in the United States. App. DN 31 at n.8.

McCarthy, et al. made gratuitous payments to Green Bay, Wisconsin Bishop David L. Ricken, previously the Bishop of Cheyenne, Wyoming, in an amount no less than $65,000.00.  Moreover, McCarthy, et al. lavished upon Bishop Ricken an all-expense-paid trip to Corato, Italy.  (Deposition Cite omitted.)
McCarthy, et al. paid the amount of $500,000.00 to then-Archbishop, now Cardinal Burke, an American prelate now permanently assigned to the Vatican.  (Deposition Cite omitted.)*
*[FOOTNOTE: McCarthy, et al. continue to conceal discoverable evidence pertaining to the significant payment of money to Cardinal Burke. See Doc #526 at 16-19 (DN526 ID10659-106600). 
In a quid pro quo arrangement, Cardinal Burke issued a letter to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, endorsing McCarthy, et al.’s adulterated the Devotion to Our Lady of America®, containing knowing and willful misstatement of material facts, on behalf of McCarthy, et al. (Deposition Cite omitted.) Prior to the issuance of his letter of endorsement, Cardinal Burke was cautioned by retired Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati and by Toledo Bishop Leonard Blair that Burke’s letter of endorsement misrepresented certain material facts. (Deposition Cite omitted.)
           During the pendency of the underlying Indiana litigation, McCarthy, et al. issued a personal

check, drawn on the account of Albert Langsenkamp, in the amount of $50,000.00 to Archbishop

Dennis Schnurr of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati.  (Deposition Cite omitted.)

The above excerpts are taken from a publicly filed document, available at the Seventh Circuit PACER website, and are furnished for the reader's discernment.

ONE HAS TO WONDER JUST HOW THOROUGHLY THE JUDGES OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS CONSIDERED AND WEIGHED THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO THEM.  APPARENTLY, NOT THOROUGHLY ENOUGH!

IS IT ANY WONDER THAT THE POPE HAS NAMED A PANEL TO ROUTE OUT THE CORRUPTION AT THE ROMAN CURIA?






 

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

UPDATE ON DOPE DEALING CATHOLIC PRIEST !

Crystal Methodist: Priest pleads guilty to drug-peddling charges

A Connecticut Roman Catholic priest pleaded guilty on Tuesday to selling 1.7 kilograms of methamphetamine.
Monsignor Kevin Wallin, the 61-year-old former pastor of St. Augustine Parish in Bridgeport, was arrested on Jan. 3, accused of receiving shipments of crystal meth from a California distributor and selling drugs to an undercover officer six times between September 2012 and January 2013.

According to court documents, Wallin had a crystal meth addiction and sold the drug out of his Waterbury apartment. He also sold drugs from the parking lot of Land of Oz in North Haven, an adult specialty store and smoke shop, that he bought in the fall.
Investigators believe that Wallin bought the store with drug proceeds and might have intended to use it to launder drug money.
On Tuesday, he pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing methamphetamine. In doing so, he admitted to receiving and distributing 1.7 kilograms of meth, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
Wallin resigned in 2011 citing health and personal issues and was suspended from public ministry last May by the Diocese of Bridgeport. He will be sentenced on June 25.
He originally pleaded not guilty in December, but changed his plea on Tuesday.

The original article can be found online at http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/02/17572502-crystal-methodist-priest-pleads-guilty-to-drug-peddling-charges?lite

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

HABEMUS PAPAM !

The blogger, along with the rest of the civilized world, watched intently as the announcement was made from the balcony, "HABEMUS PAPAM."

We have a Pope, indeed.  An obviously humble and deeply spiritual man, unlike SELF-PROCLAIMED POPE OF THE CHURCH-INAMERICA KEVIN "BLACK BART" McCARTHY.

To cite but one example, following his election to the Chair of St. Peter, Pope Francis rode back to his hotel in a mini-van with a number of his confreres, where he personally paid his hotel bill, out of his own pocket !

POPE BLACK BART McCARTHY, however, is quite the opposite!  Not only did he and PRINCE ALBERT LANGSENKRAMP swindle substantial amounts of money and steal the original Our Lady of America Statue, a Crucifix, and Sister Mildred's hand-carved plaque of Our Lady of America from Sister Mary Joseph Therese, POPE BLACK BART DEMANDED THAT SISTER PAY HIS TELEPHONE BILLS!!!

The Holy Father chose to be known as Francis, in honor of St. Francis of Assisi, a humble Italian friar and preacher who, as a Saint of the Church, is esteemed for his humility.

Compare and contrast POPE BLACK BART McCARTHY who, among other of his boasts, has claimed that he is one of the most brilliant legal (Beagle?) minds in the entirety of the universe.

Moreover, while the Holy Father is obviously a deeply spiritual man, perfect for the times, it is also obvious that POPE BLACK  BART McCARTHY and his co-conspirator, PRINCE ALBERT LANGSENKRAMP, a Knight (night?) of the Holey (not to be confused with Holy) Round Table, are MORALLY BANKRUPT.

Today, the blogger viewed the Mass of Installment of Pope Francis, on the feast day of St. Joseph, broadcast on EWTN.  As the cameras panned the crowd, the blogger failed to catch sight of POPE BLACK BART among the clergy and dignitaries present.

That seemed rather odd, since McCARTHY has made the claim that, as the Supreme Pastor of the Catholic Church, he would be working directly beneath Benedict XVI.  One would expect Pope Benedict's right-hand man to be front and center at the installment of Pope Francis. Please see prior post at this blog, captioned ANOTHER McCARTHY CON-GAME UNCOVERED ! found at http://ourladyofamerica.blogspot.com/2011/09/another-mccarthy-con-game-uncovered.html

Now that Pope Benedict has retired, McCARTHY WILL HAVE TO COME UP WITH ANOTHER SCAM SINCE HE SO DESPISES SPANISH SPEAKING PEOPLES, WHICH WOULD MOST CERTAINLY INCLUDE POPE FRANCIS, AN ARGENTINIAN!

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

AN INTERESTING REVELATION !!!

As regular readers of this blog are aware, the blogger has access to statistics for this blog, provided by Blogger.com.  Please see prior post at this blog, captioned CORRUPT CANON LAWYER A REGULAR VISITOR TO THIS BLOG !!! , found at http://ourladyofamerica.blogspot.com/2013/02/corrupt-canon-lawyer-regular-visitor-to.html .

Since that posting, CORRUPT CANON LAWYER AND CONSUMMATE VATICAN SCAMMER ALAN KERSHAW and SELF-PROCLAIMED POPE OF THE CHURCH-IN-AMERICA KEVIN "BLACK BART" McCARTHY  quickly changed their tactics, SINCE THEY WERE FOUND OUT AND PUBLICLY EXPOSED .

For a brief time thereafter, USING THE SAME ITALIAN SEARCH ENGINE, they changed the search term from "ALAN KERSHAW LAWYER" to "KEVIN McCARTHY."  

Then, the light bulb apparently went off, and they decided to attempt to conceal their tracks . . . KIND OF !

PICTURED BELOW IS AN IMAGE OF STATS TAKEN FROM THIS BLOG ON FEBRUARY 27, 2013:

  



THESE STATISTICS REVEAL SOME RATHER INTERESTING INFORMATION ABOUT SCAMMER KERSHAW AND POPE BLACK BART McCARTHY!

The reader will note that there were TEN INQUIRIES to this blog, EIGHT  of those inquiries originated from ITALIAN WEBSITES, designated by the identifiers "IT."

Interestingly TWO OF THESE INQUIRES originated from websites related to Internet Videos.

THE LAST OF THE INQUIRIES TO THE BLOG RAISES SOME INTERESTING QUESTIONS, DOES IT NOT ?

The reader should take note of the fact that SCAMMER KERSHAW and POPE BLACK BART, TWO SUBJECTS PRESENTLY RESIDING IN ITALYare likely the only two individuals in the whole of Italy with any interest at all in this blog.

It certainly seems likely, on the basis of the evidence available, that SCAMMER KERSHAW and POPE BLACK BART accessed this blog from the website located at LIVEPORNOFEEDS.COM.   

HOW ABOUT THAT?  MIGHT IT BE THAT SCAMMER KERSHAW AND POPE BLACK BART  HAVE TAKEN TIME OUT FROM  TROLLING FOR PORN TO ACCESS THIS BLOG ???